Saturday, October 8, 2011

Random Reviews-The Interrupters

It seemed for a while that the city of Toronto was the deadliest place on Earth, when guns started going off everywhere. Turns out, that was nothing compared to the war zone that was, and still is, Chicago. The situation is so bad, the government is considering sending in the National Guard.

Despite all this, "The Interrupters" is actually pretty peaceful. Instead of the good guys shooting and beating on any gangbangers, they talk to them. Just talk. And that actually makes all the difference.

Director Steve James, the same guy you sports fans remember as the director of "Hoop Dreams", tackles yet another story of inner-city life and hardships. He follows three Interrupters, who work for the organization Ceasefire to prevent conflicts: Ameena Matthews, Cobe Williams, and Eddie Bocanegra. All three have tons of street cred and smarts, due to the fact that they all have been former violence causers themselves. Both Ameena and Cobe had influential criminal fathers (Ameena's father, Jeff Fort, was actually one of the most powerful gang leaders of his day), and they followed those dangerous paths in their youth. Also, Eddie is scarred forever by a retaliatory killing he did as a 17-year-old. Now, all three are reformed, and they strive hard to clean their neighborhoods of the disease of violence that has swept the city.

Steve James never shows us much explicit stuff, but he does use the less explicit to it's full potential. We see all these roadside graves, shoddy yet meaningful, covered with the names of those the deceased left behind. We see a funeral for a teenage boy that gets intense, as Ameena takes the oppurtunity to talk with the youth present. The movie doesn't use violence as it's sucker-punch, but it instead hits us with the consequences of this violence. We see people bawling constantly, but we also see the intense emotions of the Interrupters themselves. All three are still finding redemption for themselves, and it's not an easy road. Not for a moment.

The film is very long, but it doesn't feel like it; the pace feels very natural, exactly like real life feels, and the material is involving and provocative enough to carry us well past two hours. We get to see Ameena work a troubled teen through the post-gang stage of her life, Eddie inspire a bunch of elementary-school kids to overcome their surroundings through artwork, and Cobe help out both a regretful teen fresh out of jail as well as a gangster with borderline-schizoprenic emotions called Flamo. There were even more stories just as important as these filmed by James' crew, but they couldn't be included due to time restraints. With so much footage, Steve never runs out of ways to make us seriously think about the violence so close to our homes, in supposedly safe, comfortable North America. As the doctor who began CeaseFire says, violence is no different from every virile disease: those who are hardest hit by the infection must be cured for it to truly be stopped. And if what is shown in the movie continues to happen around America, that hope of a cure might come true.

"The Interrupters" is sad, sometimes strangely funny, down-to-earth, and necessary viewing for everyone who thinks the rash of urban violence cannot be stopped: it can, and, for the sake of the next generation, it must.

As I said, there isn't that much violence in "The Interrupters", but there is plenty of heroism.

Friday, July 15, 2011

Random Reviews: Transformers 3



Rating: 3.5 out of a possible 5


Like Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, and Doctor Who, Transformers is immortal. Since 1984, when the Autobots and Decepticons (formerly the Micromen and Diaclones in Japan) first premiered in North America, the Robots in Disguise have lived on through cartoons, comic books, fanzines, fan-sites, toy lines, toy line relaunches, and basic love for the entire franchise. And now it has truly come to a head with Michael Bay's/Steven Spielberg's "Transformers 3".


I'm not going to blast or mock this film, like so many critics have; I already did that when I saw it. The point is, you cannot judge "Tr3" as a movie. You can only judge it as an incredibly violent, two-and-a-half hour volley of nonsensical carnage, awesome CGI, and giant robots beating the living tar out of each other. That's why I'm saying "Dark of the Moon" is good: it's completely entertaining, and we also get some brand-new scenes of incredible special effects.


As usual, the plot is very complicated, even for someone who is well-versed in Transformers mythology. In this one, we learn that the REAL reason JFK sent three men to the moon in 1969 was to investigate a giant alien spacecraft, the Autobot ship the Ark, before the Russians got to it. Years later, a shunned Sam Witwicky and his super-hot girlfriend Carly get entangled with the Autobots again, this time helping them to keep the parts for a space bridge (a transdimensional portal) out of the Decepticons' slimy hands, as well as deal with a certain very important Autobot, Sentinel Prime, who was on the Ark. All this leads to an HOUR-LONG battle in a Decepticon-ruled Chicago to stop them from bringing Cybertron to Earth. While the Autobot ranks stay pretty much the same, the Decepticons get an awesome new addition: Shockwave, the single baddest Con we have ever seen (the guy's entire right arm is a laser cannon!). What dissapointed me though was that Shock recieves no lines, that and the fact that Patrick Dempsey does NOT die at the hands of a Decep. I was really looking forward to that.


The first Transformers is still the best, but this one stands out amongst the past two in a completely unexpected way: it's dark. Not "Dark Knight" dark, but still gutsy enough to show scenes with people getting blown apart by invading Decepticons. Perhaps Michael Bay did this on his own, but I suspect Steven had a big say. The Chicago scenes of science-fictional genocide, as well as a killing by firing squad for a Jewish-looking Autobot, Wheeljack, bring to mind similar scenes from "Schindler's List". Also, a scene where Sam and Carly hide from a Decepticon is vaguely like "Jurassic Park", mostly the famous scenes with the Velociraptors. Whether Steven took command a little more or not, I have to give due credit to Michael for the action scenes. I have never seen better sequences of robot-on-robot pounding in my entire life, and it brings pure child-like happiness to my heart. Even better, these Transformers are voiced by Nerd Gods. It is strangely funny and awesome to hear Hugo Weaving start fighting Leonard Nimoy.


All in all, Transformers 3 is exactly what it should be: an adrenaline high of senseless violence. That does not make it a lousy film, but rather, it makes it some kind of a masterpiece of unadulterated, unabashed action cinema. It is not without heart though, and that is what makes it superior to "Revenge of the Fallen", and every other average blow-em-up film. Thankfully, we have been given an incredibly satisfying ending to the Transformers live-action films, just as long as you are not picky.























Thursday, June 23, 2011

Best Movie Posters EVER

























































































































































































































































































































































































































































There was a time when movie posters were not an art form in my eyes. That has drastically changed over the past few years though, as I have come to realize how important that one-sheet is, and how artistic it can be. And now, since I'm too exhausted from 2nd term to write something, I have compiled together my complete collection of great movie posters. Enjooooyyy.... (I apologize for the odd spacing between the posters).





































Monday, May 2, 2011

Books that should be Movies by now



























There are some books that leap off the page so well it already seems like a movie. "Harry Potter", "Lord of the Rings", "Jurassic Park"... these all have had fitting celluloid versions. But there are still some classic books that have yet to see the light of the theatre...which they all deserve.

1.The Ear, The Eye, and The Arm (Nancy Farmer)
This is kind of a unkown classic, undeservedly underrated. A child-abduction thriller set in future Zimbabwe, it might be in a niche market, but at least it's something completely original, and I think African-American sci-fi fans are waiting for their own little cult favourite.
Director: Steven Spielberg

2.Animal Farm (George Orwell)
Yes, I know there have already been two films made for this book, but I want something better. I'm thinking that maybe what "Animal Farm" needs is "Fantastic Mr. Fox"-style hand-done animation and a more Latin-American bend. No, I'm not suggesting that because I have a massive cultural ego. It's because I feel no other continent fits the revolution-gone-bad moral of Orwell's story better than South America. Just by reading up on the multiple civil wars that have filled that continent's history, you can tell it would be the perfect setting for this tale.
Director: Terry George

3.Ender's Game (Orson Scott Card)
I have kind of a soft spot for sci-fi, especially if the main character almost has the same name as me (I'm Ander, he's Ender. We could be twins!). EG is a brilliant novel, and is almost perfectly adaptable, although casting Ender would be difficult. This one adaptation is actually in the works, although we haven't heard anything yet.
Director: Ridley Scott
Starring Kodi Smit-Mcphee as Ender (okay, maybe not that difficult. This guy should do well in the role, despite his age.)

4.The Chrysalids (John Wyndham)
Okay, so this one might be a little too weird to adapt. Also, the lack of action and hardcore, deformed mutants might be a serious problem. At least the demand for supernatural teens is up (eg. "Harry P.", "Twilight"), and we also have the special effects to make truly believable and bizarre mutants.
Director: Peter Jackson

5.The Silmarillion (J.R.R Tolkien)
As you will recall, I made a post on whether or not making a "Silmarillion" movie was a good idea. I still think it's a decent idea, despite all the obvious difficulties, and it would be an exciting cinematic experience. The book is probably Tolkien's most impressive and immersive work, and all doubts aside, the series of movies made from this volume would be truly epic.
Director:Peter Jackson/Guillermo Del Toro
Starring Ralph Fiennes as Morgoth

6.The Tennis Shoes Among the Nephites series (Chris Heimerdinger)
This is a REALLY good series. I've only read the first one completely, and am almost completed the second one, but the adventures are so cool and funny that they, like 60% of all Tom Clancy novels, positively scream "make me a movie". Only Mormon people will know this series, but enough people are fans of these books that it could do very well in Salt Lake.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Best of the Best: Mormon Movies


Due to my faith, which would be the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, me and my family and friends have knowledge of one of the bigger branches of American independent filmmaking: Mollywood. Yes, Mollywood, that small little frontier of film production by the Mormon community. No matter you're opinion, these are not just tolerable but actually great films made by dedicated LDS filmmmakers. And these are the cream of the Utah crop...

The Best Two Years (2003)
I'm putting the best on first, which I know you're supposed to do last but I just want to get it out of the way. This is probably the "Citizen Kane" of Mor-vies. While other films are either all comedy or all drama, this has even doses of both, making for a very satisfying and realistic movie. Filmed on location in the Netherlands, the tale follows two pairs of Mormon missionaries as one of them, Elder Rogers, deals with his lack of faith and a new "greenie" mission-mate Elder Calhoun. Highly recommended, especially if you find missionaries annoying.


Baptists at our Barbecue (2004)
Think "Deliverance", without all the perverted stuff. That's the kind of small town our main character, Clark Bender, finds himself in after getting a transfer in order to escape Provo. It's also where he tries to end a nasty feud between the equally-large Mormon and Baptist communities, all while trying to get close to a beautiful blonde girl named Charity. Has some laugh-out-loud moments, and provides a nice and quirky look at religion that you can't get anywhere else.

The R.M. (2004)
Undoubtedly one of the best Mo-comedies ever, The R.M. has the ability to always be funny, no matter how many times you watch it. Missionary Jared Phelps finds a completely different world from the one he remembers when he returns home from Wyoming. When one thing after the other goes horribly wrong, Jared wonders why serving the Lord for two whole years has gotten him into this mess, and how he will ever get back up. Weird Mormons at their best.

One Good Man (2009)
"Minimalist masterpiece" might sound a bit much, but that's the kind of filmmaking being done here to give a modern-day fable about a LDS dad trying to stay strong during a tough time a good , charming atmosphere. This movie also proves that you don't need to be gross or mean-spirited to make a great family drama (ahem, "American Beauty").

The Singles Ward/The Singles 2nd Ward (2002/2007)
Both these films have a great and funny look at Mormon dating and marriage, but I enjoyed "The 2nd Ward" better. Fluffy, romantic, and not without soul, and if you like those things, this is good stuff.

The Home Teachers (2004)
Despite being a box office and critical bomb, this is still a pretty funny Mormon version of "Planes, Trains, and Automobiles", with a good message at the end just like the latter film. Greg Blazer and Nelson Parker are two very different peas in a pod: Greg doesn't take his religion seriously, and Nelson takes it too seriously. Fortunately, the two both learn valuable lessons when they partner up for a disastrous and hilarious afternoon of Home Teaching. Still a good film.

Sons of Provo (2004)
One of the funniest of the funny, this is one comedy every Mormon has to see, and that has enough slapstick and boy-band mockery to appeal somewhat to non-members. A "This Is Spinal Tap"-style mockumentary, the movie follows the gut-busting misadventures of the boy-band Everclean as they try to survive the Utah pop-music scene (or lack thereof). Songs are both funny and unintentionally funky.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Blow off the Bunny: The 2 Best Religious Easter films








This weekend marks both Easter and Passover Seder, and you know what that means: out of the hundreds of people buying chocolate and bunny decorations, there's going to be a small minority of us paying attention to more serious matters. Both Jew and Christian alike will spend the weekend learning about and remembering important moments in religious and worldwide history, and that can mean a chance to see our old Easter favorites. And no, that doesn't mean "The Ten Commandments", which can be substituted for these two awesomer (and in my opinion, more powerful) films:



1. Ben-Hur ( William Wyler, 1959 )


Despite massive sets and a cast of hundreds, Ben-Hur still manages to keep an eye on the human aspect of the story. Ben's fury and violent revenge on his former BFF Messala is a great character flaw, and makes his newfound Christianity at the climax of the film a genuinely redeeming moment. The Crucifixion is presented well, with music and the reactions of others replacing the need for gore and brutality (ex. "The Passion of the Christ"). This movie also boasts the best ( and most dangerous ) chariot race scene, as well as the great decision to never show Christ's face, only his actions. This is an epic tale that never forgets the very personal core: Jesus Christ being the Redeemer of all.



2. The Prince of Egypt ( Brenda Champan+Simon Wells+Steve Hickner, 1998 )


"Prince" is a great movie, a worthy first picture from the Dreamworks team. Not only is it suitably powerful and heartwarming, but it's open enough for every religion to enjoy, rather than just the Hebrew community. That said, this might be better for Passover celebrations than Easter. "Prince of Egypt" is an ideal film to help kids better understand the story of the Exodus that is revered by several major faiths, and is also mature enough for adults to enjoy. While Val Kilmer is an odd choice to voice Moses, it's barely noticeable amid the perfect storytelling and intense soundtrack. So just pop in this gem once you're done lighting the Menorah and reciting the...wait a minute, I think I'm mixing up holidays...




Well, that's my critique of the two movies I feel are the best to show this time of year. Hope you agree, and Happy Easter/Passover!


































Monday, April 18, 2011

The Silmarillion Movie: Yes or No?



After "Lord of the Rings", it seemed like anything was filmable. If Peter Jackson was able to bring Tolkien's grand opus to life on the silver screen, why not anything else? One failed "Watchmen" adaptation later, people are starting to think that there are some books that can't be touched. And one of these is "The Silmarillion".


While not nearly as famous as "LOTR", Tolkien's Middle-Earth version of the Bible is a hot topic among die-hard J.R.R fans. Is it truly Tolkien's work, if his son compiled and added parts of it? What is it's intended place in the M-E canon? But if one thing is for sure, it's that many of us Tolkienites would be perfectly cool with an awesome film version of it. But why would or wouldn't it work?


Well, it wouldn't work because, for one thing, it's far too long. You thought the Harry Potter movies were too much, imagine four 0r five 4-hour long films coming out every two years. Yeah, it would be HUGE. Secondly, the public is sadly unaware, and probably uninterested, in this saga, and so probably wouldn't flock to the theatres the same way they did for LOTR. Untop of all this, "The Silm." is NOT NEARLY as light and cheerful as LOTR was at some moments. Compared to the funny and happy moments where Legolas and Gimli traded height jokes, TS is as dark and tragic a collection of stories as you can wish to get. From the Fall of The Children Of Hurin, in which a human named Turin unknowingly marries and impregnates his own sister Neinor, causing both of them to commit suicide, it's clear to see this is not for the average viewer.


Now for my point of view, which states that a "Silmarillion" movie can and should be made. Yes, it would be a MASSIVE (I love capitals) project, and would probably require an international team of directors, scholars, visual artists, actors, and producers the likes of which the worldwide filmaking community has never seen before. Yes we're talking not one, but a series of million-dollar, "Lawrence of Arabia"-style epics with no happy endings, only new beginnings. But special effects and the ability to realize fantasy worlds have become almost limitless, so a TS film would be at least possible to do. People have also shown an appetite for Tolkien, if LOTR's success is anything to go by, so it's not like a film would be a total flop. It may seem like an impossible task, but with the right team and family of hard-working film wizards, anything is manageable.


I guess I can see why Christopher Tolkien is reluctant to allow a "Silmarillion" movie. I mean, this is his father's baby, his life's work, his ninth symphony. This would have to be a MAGNIFICENT series (yes, Capitals!!!) to be able to sit right and please everyone, but it's not like it's impossible. More like miracle-working. This would have to top the "Lord of the Rings" film trilogy, or we risk disturbing J.R.R's rest. May the Valar be with us.